Negotiating the Forbidden Zone: A Sociological Study on Spatial Violations in Urban Riparian Areas

Authors

  • Umar Diwarman Eisenring Department of Public Works and Spatial Planning Gowa
  • Linggar Ismail Eisenring Public Work Department, Gowa

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v3i8.93

Keywords:

Riparian Settlements, Spatial Violation, Sociology of Space, Informal Housing, Inclusive Planning, Gowa Regency

Abstract

This study explores the sociological dimensions of spatial violations in urban riparian zones, focusing on communities residing along the Jeneberang River in Gowa Regency, South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, field observations, and documentation to understand how marginalized populations negotiate their presence in areas officially designated as restricted or protected. The findings reveal that encroachments are not merely acts of defiance against spatial regulations but are driven by economic vulnerability, historical land-use patterns, and inconsistent policy enforcement. Residents often justify their presence in these "forbidden zones" through moral reasoning, local social networks, and survival strategies. The research highlights a significant disconnect between state spatial planning and the lived experiences of the urban poor, where top-down eviction efforts often ignore the complex social fabric of these communities. In alignment with President Prabowo's Asta Cita, particularly the commitment to inclusive development and improved public welfare, this study calls for spatial governance approaches that integrate community participation and social justice. The novelty of this research lies in its sociological lens, shifting the discourse from legalistic or environmental perspectives toward a more human-centered understanding of spatial negotiation and urban inequality in Indonesia.

References

Cleaver, F. (2012). Development Through Bricolage: Rethinking Institutions for Natural Resource Management. London: Routledge.

Depari, C. D. A. (2024). Buku Ajar RAGAM KONSEP DAN METODE DALAM KAJIAN ARSITEKTUR LINGKUNGAN DAN PERILAKU.

Kusuma, I. I. G. B. W. (2024). Geotermal Bedugul: Antara Kebutuhan Energi Listrik, Energi yang Tersedia, dan Masalah Sosial yang Terjadi (Bagian I Sosio-Religi). Nilacakra.

Kusumiyati, S. P. (2024). Sistem Hortikultura: Desain Pascapanen dan Pengendalian Kualitas Berkelanjutan. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Monterastelli, A. J., Adams, J., Eastman, C. I., & Crowley, S. J. (2024). The forbidden zone for sleep is more robust in adolescents compared to adults. Frontiers in sleep, 2, 1304647.

PANDIANGAN, R. (2024). REKONSTRUKSI REGULASI PERLINDUNGAN PEMEGANG HAK ATAS TANAH BERBASIS NILAI KEADILAN (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang).

Roy, A. (2005). Urban Informality: Toward an Epistemology of Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 71(2), 147–158.

Siahaan, R. (2025). Analisis Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Penggarapan Liar Atau Penguasaan Daerah Aliran Sungai (DAS) Di Kabupaten Simalungun (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Medan Area).

Subroto, T. Y. W. (2024). Modal sosial dalam masyarakat kampung perkotaan dalam tinjauan budaya Jawa. UGM PRESS.

Sudiarta, I. I. K., Situmeang, I. Y. P., & Suryani, S. A. M. P. (2024). Pengelolaan Pesisir Terpadu. Scopindo Media Pustaka.

Tursunov, I. G., & Rakhmanov, M. A. (2024). Investigation of the width of the forbidden zoneheavily doped semiconductors. The American Journal of Interdisciplinary Innovations and Research, 6(11), 10-14.

Yan, Z., Zhang, L., & Song, F. (2024). Capacity planning of hydro-wind-solar hybrid power systems considering hydropower forbidden zones. Global Energy Interconnection, 7(6), 798-811.

Yiftachel, O. (2009). Theoretical Notes on ‘Gray Cities’: The Coming of Urban Apartheid? Planning Theory, 8(1), 88–100.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-16

Issue

Section

Articles