Iran’s Strategic Responses  to Pressure from the United States and Israel in Contemporary Conflict

Muhammad Husein Maruapey; Rajab  Lestaluhu; Mulyadi

doi:10.59890/ijarss.v4i4.229

Authors

Muhammad Husein Maruapey Universitas Djuanda
Rajab Lestaluhu Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong
Mulyadi Universitas Djuanda

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijarss.v4i4.229

Keywords:

Defensive Realism, Asymmetric Warfare, Forward Defense Doctrine, Strategic Culture, National Dignity

Abstract

This article examines Iran’s strategic responses to pressure from the United States and Israel in the context of contemporary conflict through a multidimensional analytical approach. It integrates defensive realism, asymmetric warfare theory, forward defense doctrine, strategic culture, and national dignity to explain the logic behind Iran’s security behavior. Using a qualitative method, this study relies on document analysis of academic literature, policy reports, and recent international publications. The findings show that Iran’s strategic behavior should not be understood merely as military aggression, but rather as a survival strategy within an anarchic international system shaped by persistent external threats. Iran has developed an asymmetric approach through missiles, drones, and proxy networks to confront adversaries with superior conventional capabilities. The forward defense doctrine also enables Iran to manage threats beyond its core territory and build strategic depth. In addition, strategic culture and revolutionary identity provide legitimacy and continuity to this defensive orientation. National dignity plays an important role in sustaining these policies despite severe economic, political, and diplomatic pressures. The article argues that Iran’s strategic response emerges from the interaction between threat structures, strategic adaptation, and identity construction. Therefore, this study contributes to Middle Eastern security studies by bridging material and ideational approaches in explaining Iran’s contemporary strategic behavior.

References

Abrahamian, E. (2013). The coup: 1953, the CIA, and the roots of modern U.S.-Iranian relations. The New Press.

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. Verso.

Arreguín-Toft, I. (2005). How the weak win wars: A theory of asymmetric conflict. Cambridge University Press.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Divsallar, A., & Azizi, H. (2024). Towards a non-Western model of security assistance: How Iran assists militaries. Mediterranean Politics, 29(2), 266–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13629395.2023.2183661

Eisenstadt, M. (2020). Operating in the gray zone: Countering Iran’s asymmetric way of war. The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.

Eslami, M. (2024). Exploring the driving forces behind Iran’s nuclear decision-making: Why Tehran remains below the weapons threshold. Journal for Peace and Nuclear Disarmament, 7(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/25751654.2024.2319381

Glaser, C. L. (2010). Rational theory of international politics: The logic of competition and cooperation. Princeton University Press.

Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Cornell University Press.

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2025a, May 31). Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 2231 (2015) (GOV/2025/24).

International Atomic Energy Agency. (2025b, September 3). Verification and monitoring in the Islamic Republic of Iran in light of United Nations Security Council resolution 2231 (2015) (GOV/2025/50).

International Institute for Strategic Studies. (2025, June 18). Israel’s attack and the limits of Iran’s missile strategy. International Institute for Strategic Studies.

Juneau, T., & Razavi, S. (Eds.). (2013). Iranian foreign policy since 2001: Alone in the world. Routledge.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Mansour, R. (2024, November 13). The axis of resilience: Israel is underestimating Iran and its allies. Foreign Affairs.

Mansour, R., Al-Shakeri, H., & Haid, H. (2025). The shape-shifting “axis of resistance”: How Iran and its networks adapt to external pressures. Chatham House.

Middle East Council on Global Affairs. (2024). Iran in the Middle East: Building bridges or expanding influence? Middle East Council on Global Affairs.

Nashir, A. K. (2023). Kebijakan luar negeri Iran dalam konflik Suriah: Kepentingan keamanan dan posisi strategis regional. Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities.

Nasr, V. (2025). Iran’s grand strategy: A political history. Princeton University Press.

Ostovar, A. (2016). Vanguard of the imam: Religion, politics, and Iran’s Revolutionary Guards. Oxford University Press.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Rouhi, M. (2025). Iran’s strategic crossroads: Options beyond the axis? The Washington Quarterly, 48(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163660X.2025.2516979

Şimşek, H. F. (2025). Iran’s proxy war paradox: Strategic gains, control issues, and operational constraints. Small Wars & Insurgencies, 36(6), 997–1024. https://doi.org/10.1080/09592318.2025.2512807

The RAND Corporation. (2025a, June 16). The Israel-Iran conflict: Q&A with RAND experts. RAND.

The RAND Corporation. (2025b, July 17). Iran and the logic of limited wars. RAND.

Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.

Yacoubian, M. (2026a, March 1). The regional reverberations of the U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Yacoubian, M. (2026b, March 16). Iran’s war strategy: Don’t calibrate—escalate. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Yacoubian, M. (2026c, March 27). Visualizing Iran’s escalation strategy. Center for Strategic and International Studies.

Zimmt, R. (2024). The evolution of Iran’s perception of Israel. Institute for National Security Studies.

Zimmt, R. (2025). Reassessing fundamental concepts in Iranian policy against the background of the war in Gaza. Institute for National Security Studies.